Sexuality and power dynamics vary across cultures and societies. There are many factors that influence views on gender and sexuality, including laws, religion, and social norms.
In some societies, sexuality is seen as a source of power, while in other societies, it is seen as a source of oppression. Sexuality is viewed as a source of power and is often used as a tool to control and manipulate people. Those in power may use sexual relationships to gain control over their subordinates and to manipulate them into doing things they may not want to do. This can be seen in cultures where men are seen as the dominant gender, and sexual relationships are used to demonstrate power and control over women. An example is in the Masaai community/the Maa culture in kenya. On the other hand, in many societies, sexuality is seen as a source of oppression. This is especially true in cultures where women are seen as the weaker gender and are less likely to have access to resources and power. In these societies, women are often seen as sexual objects and are expected to adhere to strict gender roles that restrict their freedom and autonomy. Women may also be expected to remain sexually pure and be denied access to resources and education. This can lead to power dynamics that are oppressive and can lead to further discrimination and inequality.
In some societies, gender roles and sexual norms are strongly tied to power dynamics, while in other societies, gender and sexuality are seen as being less relevant to power dynamics. In these societies, power dynamics are determined by gender and sexuality, with some genders and sexuality seen as having more power than others. For example, patriarchy is a system of power in which men are seen as having a greater degree of control over society than women. This system is often enforced through social norms such as those that dictate how women should dress and behave, and what kinds of relationships they are allowed to have. In some societies, homosexuality can also be seen as a violation of power dynamics, with same-sex relationships viewed as being less valid than heterosexual relationships.
However, gender and sexuality are seen as being much less relevant to power dynamics in other societies. In these societies, power dynamics are determined more by factors such as wealth, social status, and education, rather than gender and sexuality. Here, people of all genders and sexuality are seen as having equal access to power, and are not judged or discriminated against based on their gender identity or sexual orientation. This type of society often has more progressive attitudes towards gender roles, sexual norms, and same-sex relationships, allowing people to express themselves without fear of stigma or judgement.
In some societies, sexual behavior is highly regulated, while in other societies, sexuality is seen as more fluid and open. Sexuality is highly regulated, often based on strict gender roles and expectations. In these societies, power dynamics tend to be hierarchical and rigid, with those in positions of power having more control over sexual behavior and restricting the sexual autonomy of those in lower positions. In other societies, sexuality is seen as more fluid and open. Here, power dynamics tend to be more egalitarian, with individuals having more freedom to express their
An example is Inequal power dynamics are inherently entrenched in university systems too, because of the hierarchical nature. Within universities, there can be many webs of power, hierarchies, and the blurring of personal and professional boundaries can occur. International research shows that one in 10 female graduate students at major research universities say they’ve been sexually harassed by a faculty member. More than half of cases involve alleged serial harassers (Cantalupo and Kidder, 2018). Unequal power dynamics between staff and student, specifically, means that the relationship can potentially be vulnerable to exploitation and can affect the capacity of a student to consent freely to sex or relationships initiated by the staff member/person in power, as well as creating barriers for the student to speak up about any sexual harm they've experienced at the hands of the staff member/person in power.
Comments
Post a Comment